[ant]

folks, i'm trying to figure out whats the difference between Miura products for Japan and their export line, their forged blades in particular. from what i can gather on the web it seems like their international versions of Tournament Blade and Small Blade are based on Miuraism Custom Forged models, perhaps with a slightly different grind ? or they just similar looking but in fact different heads sourced from different forges ? the other thing i'm curious about is price difference : international offering is about a grand less than its Japanese counterpart. and if they are basically the same product i would have thought that since they both made in Japan that domestic version would cost less than export due to shipping, taxes etc. if you happen to be in the know and can answer these questions or at least some of them that would be much appreciated.

[TourSpecGolfer]

ant, on Mar 19 2010, 02:13 AM, said:

folks, i'm trying to figure out whats the difference between Miura products for Japan and their export line, their forged blades in particular. from what i can gather on the web it seems like their international versions of Tournament Blade and Small Blade are based on Miuraism Custom Forged models, perhaps with a slightly different grind ? or they just similar looking but in fact different heads sourced from different forges ? the other thing i'm curious about is price difference : international offering is about a grand less than its Japanese counterpart. and if they are basically the same product i would have thought that since they both made in Japan that domestic version would cost less than export due to shipping, taxes etc. if you happen to be in the know and can answer these questions or at least some of them that would be much appreciated.

It's the same stuff. Many of the International product is older generation Miura Giken product. The Miura International blade is not the same as the Miuraism series. It may be based off the same raw blank but that I can't be sure of.

Both products are of the same Miura quality.

[Mjr. Diarrhea]

TourSpecGolfer, on Mar 18 2010, 07:51 PM, said:

It's the same stuff. Many of the International product is older generation Miura Giken product. The Miura International blade is not the same as the Miuraism series. It may be based off the same raw blank but that I can't be sure of.

Both products are of the same Miura quality.

I had the limited edition US blades and now i have the MB-5003s (Japan). In my opinion, which is usually right (ha), the MB-5003 is a better and more solid feeling, more forgiving iron. And it's not in my head. I assure you.

[ant]

hmm, thats weird. Miura Giken site lists production year 2004 for Miuraism and 2007 for MB-5003. or is that just a year they were introduced to the market and then they make revisions like recent groove conformance etc ?

also do you know what is Miuraism in a nutshell ? ie whats the difference with say their MB-5003 ? i did try to run their page thru Google Translate and from the gibberish that came out it seems that Miuraism supposed to have very strict quality control, very strict weighting and things like that. something i thought would apply to all Miura in general ?

TourSpecGolfer, on Mar 19 2010, 03:51 AM, said:

It's the same stuff. Many of the International product is older generation Miura Giken product. The Miura International blade is not the same as the Miuraism series. It may be based off the same raw blank but that I can't be sure of.

Both products are of the same Miura quality.

[ant]

this is interesting. which one you had, small blade ? are you comparing them based on the same shaft ?

Mjr. Diarrhea, on Mar 19 2010, 10:41 AM, said:

I had the limited edition US blades and now i have the MB-5003s (Japan). In my opinion, which is usually right (ha), the MB-5003 is a better and more solid feeling, more forgiving iron. And it's not in my head. I assure you.

[frogeye]

I thought I would share some pics with you guys.
As they say a picture is worth a thoudand words.
Look and you will see differences. Whether they come from the same model or not is hard to say, Chris on the money when he says feeling and sensation of both are true to the miura tradition: fantastic.
Enjoy.
F

Attached image(s)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

[ant]

thanx for posting comparison pix! it looks like 5003 [if i'm telling right which is which] is actually slightly smaller than their int tour blade. is it what it actually feels/looks like to you ? seems like 5003 is kinda closer in terms of head sizes to their int small blade or Miuraism compact blade, maybe just a wee bit bigger but still smaller than int tour blade ?

frogeye, on Mar 19 2010, 02:39 PM, said:

I thought I would share some pics with you guys.
As they say a picture is worth a thoudand words.
Look and you will see differences. Whether they come from the same model or not is hard to say, Chris on the money when he says feeling and sensation of both are true to the miura tradition: fantastic.
Enjoy.
F

[frogeye]

Having a closer look the Miura Tournament Blade is the same size/length compared to the MG 5003. But I would suspect these two blades to be longer than the baby blade or the series 1957.
The slight difference is the muscle which extends higher on the Miura tournament Blade than on the MG 5003, this gives you the impression of having more mass behind the sweet spot.
The sole is also wider on the MG 5003 than on the Miura Blade.
I think you might be correct the Miuraism SB-01 does look identical to the Miura Tournament Blade.
I hope this helps.
F

[ant]

that helps, thanx a bunch!

frogeye, on Mar 19 2010, 10:13 PM, said:

Having a closer look the Miura Tournament Blade is the same size/length compared to the MG 5003. But I would suspect these two blades to be longer than the baby blade or the series 1957.
The slight difference is the muscle which extends higher on the Miura tournament Blade than on the MG 5003, this gives you the impression of having more mass behind the sweet spot.
The sole is also wider on the MG 5003 than on the Miura Blade.
I think you might be correct the Miuraism SB-01 does look identical to the Miura Tournament Blade.
I hope this helps.
F

[Mjr. Diarrhea]

I had the same shaft TT X7 in both the Miura Baby Blades Limited Edition and the now the Miura MB-5003. Both felt great, don't get me wrong, but the MB-5003 feels better. It's a more solid feeling iron, as well as a more pure feeling iron. I could tell the first time I struck a ball.
I also heard Miuraism is their top of the line model where they somehow choose or manipulate the grain flow of the steel they use in forging??? I'm not an expert on this kind of thing but it's something along those lines.
I also heard the Miura Giken irons are designed for, is it softer conditions? than the N. America Miura irons. Maybe it's the other way around...... whatever the conditions are more often like for each area.

[xjrs6]

Like Mjr I too have both sets and concur that the MB 5003 are the nicer to play,albiet I have different shaft combo's. The 5003 works perfectly fine here on UK course conditions .Nice comparison pics never really looked at them before it appears the weight has been ditributed lower in the MB's.

[ant]

thanx alot folks, your answers and comments are really helpful to me!